• About JacobBarlow.com
  • Cemeteries in Utah
  • D.U.P. Markers
  • Doors
  • Exploring Utah Email List
  • Geocaching
  • Historic Marker Map
  • Links
  • Movie/TV Show Filming Locations
  • Oldest in Utah
  • Other Travels
  • Photos Then and Now
  • S.U.P. Markers
  • U.P.T.L.A. Markers
  • Utah Cities and Places.
  • Utah Homes for Sale
  • Utah Treasure Hunt

JacobBarlow.com

~ Exploring with Jacob Barlow

JacobBarlow.com

Tag Archives: Duchesne County

Stockmore Ranger Station

31 Saturday Jan 2026

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Duchesne County, NRHP, utah

Stockmore Ranger Station

The Stockmore Ranger Station, built in c.19141 in the Ashley National Forest, is an extant reminder of the early days of the Forest Service in Utah. After the Forest Reserve Act of 1891, the Division of Forestry was formed for the management of the land and timber sales. The United States Forest Service, as we now know it, was officially established by President Theodore Roosevelt on July 1, 1905, being placed under the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture. Rangers were required to closely monitor the land, but because of the remoteness of the forests, buildings were acquired or constructed to house the rangers and to establish a federal government presence on the land. The Stockmore Ranger Station is one of the earliest remaining structures on the Ashley National Forest built specifically by the Forest Service to house a ranger. It is still in good condition and has seen little alteration from its original conception. For this reason it is a good example of the facilities in which these overseers of the forests lived during the first few decades of the Forest Service’s existence.

The Stockmore Ranger Station is located on 11000 North off Warm Springs Drive and Highway 35 north of Hanna, Utah, it was added to the National Register of Historic Places (#99001293) on November 12, 1999.

The Stockmore Ranger Station is named after the town of Stockmore which was situated a 1/4 mile to the east of the ranger station site. The town, abandoned before the station was constructed, supposedly received its name from the combined surnames of two men, Stockman and More, who perpetrated a hoax on the premise that gold was discovered in the area. A prospector from the Klondike was hired by Stockman and More to take some gold nuggets to Salt Lake City and let them “accidentally” be noticed by men in the saloons. The prospector was then to admit that he had found the gold in the Stockmore area (which he really had not). What followed was a small rush of prospectors to the area. Stockman and More were prepared to “sell” lots to prospectors on land which they did not actually own. The hoax, however, was discovered in November 1906, when two prospectors, George Wilcken and John Toops, went to Vernal to file homestead claims and a Federal Land Officer overheard the two men talking about the tremendous growth of the town. The officer questioned the two and checked his maps, but found no listing of the town. The two homesteaders returned to Stockmore and reported to the election judges (elections for Mayor and Marshall were being held that day) that the town was not a legal town. After the elections a large party was held and word quickly spread about the ruse. Stockman and More, upon learning that their plot had been discovered, slipped out of town that night. One of them (the history does not mention which one) was later apprehended in Montana, the other was never heard of after that. At one time the town boasted a blacksmith shop, a livery stable, a hotel and cafe, a boarding house, a general store, four saloons, and a number of houses. The town was quickly abandoned, and by 1915 the only trace left was the Stockmore school and the Forest Service ranger station. Whether any gold was actually discovered in Stockmore is not mentioned. Although the ranger station and buildings were not constructed until well after the town’s demise, they are the only reminders that it ever existed.

The administrative site where the Stockmore ranger station is located was withdrawn from the Uinta and Ouray Indian Reservation and approved to receive a ranger station in 1908, the year that the Ashley National Forest was established. The site was immediately claimed for settlement by a mixed-blood Indian. During this period, half-breeds were terminated from Ute Indian Tribal roles. The Department of the Interior did not intercede and the site was sold to Lawrence A. Pike, although he did not actually receive a patent until July 31,1961. The ranger station was still constructed although the Forest Service did not receive the land until after October 2,1962, when the land was condemned. After problems arose through back taxes and the condemnation notice through Duchesne County, the title was cleared and quitclaim-deeded to the Forest Service.

Ranger and guard stations were used as work and living centers for forest crews who managed and presided over Forest Service lands. They were built mainly as a convenience before the automobile became common transportation because the Forest Service lands and work areas were so far from the personnel’s homes. The buildings and sites were also used as social centers for other people such as sheep herders and miners who worked in the vicinity. By approximately the 1950s, a majority of the ranger stations were being located in urban settings for convenience as the Forest Service went to a more centralized administrative plan, although some of the ranger and guard stations were, and still are used for seasonal management of the forests.

Forest Service administrative sites fell into two categories, ranger stations and guard stations, although the application of the terms has blurred somewhat over the years. Basically, ranger stations were larger than guard stations and were used as a year-’round base for the Ranger, his staff, and oftentimes his family. Buildings on a ranger station site might include a dwelling, an office (these two might be combined in the same building as in this case), a warehouse, and other buildings used for maintenance and storage of animals and vehicles. The large ranger complexes demonstrated administrative complexity and implied permanence on the site. Guard stations, on the other hand, housed from two to four crew members who came from various parts of the state and country, and were placed in remote areas of the forest where the crews worked during the summer. Since they were used for just a portion of the year, guard station sites met basic requirements, usually only consisting of a bunk house, garage or barn, and perhaps a storage shed. Because of the heavy snowfall during the winter, the guard stations, and some ranger stations, were only occupied seasonally, usually between May and October, or until snow prevented travel on the roads. Stockmore was used to house the district ranger until the c. 1950s when it was converted to seasonal use for forest crews.

Forest Service administrative buildings have not been systematically researched on a national level, nor does any consistent typology exist, mainly because of the variation in types and styles up until the 1930s. At this time, the National Forest Service adopted official plans for nationwide implementation. Using various means, including the Civilian Conservation Corps, Forest Service employees, and private contractors and individuals, the Forest Service was able to construct a large number of buildings during the 1930s and early 1940s.

These buildings are generally of wood-frame construction, with various styles of wood siding, and concrete or stone foundations. Several different styles of guard stations were designed, along with accompanying outbuildings which included barns, garages, storage sheds, and large warehouses. Although often thought of as being rather spartan, ranger stations could be quite homey and colorful. A Forest Service “Improvement Plan” describes the interior of a dwelling:

“Interior: Living-dining room and bedroom walls all finished with two coats calcimine in the following colors: Living, dining room, light tan. Bedroom walls peach, ceiling cream, bedroom light tan. Floors and wood work, cherry stain and varnish. Bath room and kitchen walls and woodwork finished with 3 coats of Nile Green enamel, two tone. Bathroom floor cherry stain and varnish, kitchen floor linoleum.”

Many of the historic Forest Service buildings are still in use and have seen little alteration, although nonhistoric alterations are becoming an increasing problem. Because their use as residences is not specifically required, some of the buildings are being used for storage, or are sitting vacant as this one is. In order to decrease the cost of maintenance, the Forest Service is opting to destroy some of the buildings, cover them with aluminum siding, or renovate them for other uses. As the number of historic guard stations decreases, the importance of understanding their place in history increases.

Indian Canyon Ranger Station

19 Monday Aug 2024

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Duchesne County, NRHP, Ranger Stations, utah

The Indian Canyon Ranger Station, built in 1914 as part of the Ashley National Forest, is an extant reminder of the early days of the Forest Service in Utah. After the Forest Reserve Act of 1891, the Division of Forestry was formed for the management of the land and timber sales. The United States Forest Service, as we now know it, was officially established by President Theodore Roosevelt on July 1, 1905, being placed under the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture. Rangers were required to closely monitor the land, but because of the remoteness of the forests, buildings were acquired or constructed to house the rangers and to establish a federal government presence on the land. The Indian Canyon Ranger Station is the earliest remaining ranger station from the Uinta National Forest, and one of the earliest remaining structures on the Ashley National Forest built specifically by the Forest Service to house a ranger. And, although it has been vacant for at least two decades, it is still in good condition and has seen little alteration from its original conception. For this reason it is a good example of the facilities in which these overseers of the forests lived during the first few decades of the Forest Service.

The Indian Canyon Ranger Station is located in Duchesne County, Utah and was added to the National Historic Register (#99001294) on October 28, 1999.

Although the Indian Canyon Ranger Station site is now a part of the Ashley National Forest, up until 1954 this section of forest belonged to the Uinta National Forest.2 The Uinta National Forest was officially named in 1906, after previously being known as the Uintah Forest Reserve. The Forest Reserves were created by President Grover Cleveland on February 22, 1897, upon recommendation by Gifford Pinchot, a government appointee under the Secretary of the Interior, that government stewardship of forest lands was required if the forests were to survive. On February 1,1905, the Forest Reserves were transferred to the Department of Agriculture, and shortly after the name “Forest Service” was adopted. The site for the Indian Canyon Ranger Station was apparently chosen because of its central location for administrative purposes of the district. It was also near a stage stop on the route between Duchesne and the rail station located at Kyune, Utah.

The land was originally withdrawn from homestead entry in December of 1906 but construction on a ranger station did not commence for another seven years. The dwelling was completed in 1914, at a cost of $1052.85, but was the only building on the site for another seven years until the barn was constructed in 1921, at a cost of $431.73. Constructed before formalized Forest Service plans were implemented, the dwelling is unique in its architecture, with no other similar Forest Service buildings existing in Northern Utah. A wood-frame latrine was constructed in 1926, and a wood-frame and bevel-siding garage/storeroom in 1935 at a cost of $1706.86.3 These two structures became dilapidated beyond repair and were removed in the c. 1970s. The 1936 “Descriptive Sheet” for the site states that at that time the dwelling had no interior bathroom, and exactly when the bathroom was added is not known, although it appears to be from the 1940s. The same memorandum suggested that the barn be moved to a different location on the site or be screened from view by trees or shrubs, but a map from 1924 shows the barn in its current location and there are no traces of tress or shrubs remaining, so apparently this suggestion was probably never carried out.

In 1936 proposals were made to upgrade the site and construct a new dwelling (Forest Service R-4, Plan #53) with a basement, and a woodshed (R-4, Plan #66), but these never came to fruition. The main reason no changes were made was probably due to the difficulty in obtaining an adequate supply of water to the site which would have been required with the larger building and increased crew size. In spite of not receiving the recommended upgrades, the Indian Canyon Ranger Station was in continual use six months out of the year as the summer headquarters for the ranger until 1950. After this time it was apparently used as a guard station for seasonal use of forest service crews until the early 1970s.

Ranger and guard stations were used as work and living centers for forest crews who managed and presided over Forest Service lands. They were built mainly as a convenience before the automobile became common transportation because the Forest Service lands and work areas were so far from the personnel’s homes. The buildings and sites were also used as social centers for other people such as sheep herders and miners who worked in the vicinity. By approximately the 1950s, a majority of the ranger stations were being located in urban settings for convenience as the Forest Service went to a more centralized administrative plan, although some of the ranger and guard stations were, and still are used for seasonal management of the forests.

Forest Service administrative sites fell into two categories, ranger stations and guard stations, although the application of the terms has blurred somewhat over the years. Basically, ranger stations were larger than guard stations and were used as a year-’round base for the Ranger, his staff, and oftentimes his family. Buildings on a ranger station site might include a dwelling, an office (these two might be combined in the same building as in this case), a warehouse, and other buildings used for maintenance and storage of animals and vehicles. The large ranger complexes demonstrated administrative complexity and implied permanence on the site. Guard stations, on the other hand, housed from two to four crew members who came from various parts of the state and country, and were placed in remote areas of the forest where the crews worked during the summer. Since they were used for just a portion of the year, guard station sites met basic requirements, usually only consisting of a bunk house, garage or barn, and perhaps a storage shed. Because of the heavy snowfall during the winter, the guard stations, and some ranger stations (such as Indian Canyon), were only occupied seasonally, usually between May and October, or until snow prevented travel on the roads.

Forest Service administrative buildings have not been systematically researched on a national level, nor does any consistent typology exist, mainly because of the variation in types and styles up until the 1930s. At this time, the National Forest Service adopted official plans for nationwide implementation. Using various means, including the Civilian Conservation Corps, Forest Service employees, and private contractors and individuals, the Forest Service was able to construct a large number of buildings during the 1930s and early 1940s.

These buildings are generally of wood-frame construction, with various styles of wood siding, and concrete or stone foundations. Several different styles of guard stations were designed, along with accompanying outbuildings which included barns, garages, storage sheds, and large warehouses. Although often thought of as being rather spartan, ranger stations could be quite homey and colorful. A Forest Service “Improvement Plan” describes the interior of a dwelling:

“Interior: Living-dining room and bedroom walls all finished with two coats calcimine in the following colors: Living, dining room, light tan. Bedroom walls peach, ceiling cream, bedroom light tan. Floors and wood work, cherry stain and varnish. Bath room and kitchen walls and woodwork finished with 3 coats of Nile Green enamel, two tone. Bathroom floor cherry stain and varnish, kitchen floor linoleum.”

Many of the historic Forest Service buildings are still in use and have seen little alteration, although nonhistoric alterations are becoming an increasing problem. Because their use as residences is not specifically required, some of the buildings are being used for storage, or are sitting vacant as this one is. In order to decrease the cost of maintenance, the Forest Service is opting to destroy some of the buildings, cover them with aluminum siding, or renovate them for other uses. As the number of historic guard stations decreases, the importance of understanding their place in history increases.

Simmons Ranch

13 Wednesday Mar 2024

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Duchesne County, NRHP, Ranches, utah

Simmons Ranch

The Simmons (Remund) Ranch has significance as an intact, excellent, and representative example of an early Homestead; quite possibly the first Homestead, in Duchesne County. As such it is the oldest surviving site of European/American settlement, in this area, formerly part of an Indian Reservation, which was opened to such settlement in the early twentieth century. This site has additional significance since the homesteader succeeded while most others in the locale failed in similar endeavors.

The Simmons Ranch is located along the Strawberry River in Duchesne County, Utah and was added to the National Historic Register (#92000463) on August 18, 1992.

An archaeological team from Brigham Young University examined the Simmons (Remund) Ranch complex (district) in late 1990 and prepared a report on buildings and structures extant at that date. They found an older part that consists of five buildings of “log cabin” construction, as well as a system of corrals, a pavilion, an underground storage facility, an irrigation ditch, and a barbeque pit. The last five items fit into the category of structures. In the western part of the area stand three other cabins and one house of “poverty siding construction,” a external wallboard or plywood material. These cabins and house were transported to the present location, hence they are “noncontributing” though they were a later part of the functional ranch.

The largest of the buildings of the “log cabin” construction stands at the southeast cornpr of the group of buildings of the ranch and measures 30 ft. by 15 ft. and consists of two rooms. This building includes a front porch, gabled roof, and stone foundation. The roof is of planks with a tin exterior added to the east side only. A loft or attic with exterior opening for entry is present which is accessable from a ladder on the outside of the cabin. The hand hewn and notched logs suggest an early date of construction. The cabin has two doors into the two rooms from the exterior on the west side and two windows on that side. One of the doors is partially missing but was a solid exterior door. The other is missing completely but a screen door is still in place on the outside. A single door on the east side is gone completely. One window on the first floor is on the north side below the opening to the loft. The county tax assessor’s office has a record which indicates that the cabin may date from as early as 1910 but the best estimate, as described below, is that it dates from approximately 1920.

A second “log cabin” appears on the map sketch as having additions on both the north and south. An original portion of this second “log cabin” of 15 ft. by 13 ft. provided the basis for the building with the portion on the north side marked “addition” on the map representing an extension of the interior. The addition made the entire “log cabin” some 28 ft. by 13 ft., not counting a plywood porch 10 ft. by 10 ft. shown on the map as a second “addition.” The original cabin had only an entry door but the plywood porch also has a door and three windows across the south end and one window on the west end. the addition on the north end simply lengthened the original building with no more doors and windows. A plywood façade of later date covered the logs but has fallen away enough to reveal underlying logs. The roof consists of dirt and sod materials, which are now bearing grasses. The additions are more than 50 years old so they are considered “contributing” to the nomination. Neither of the two larger “log cabins” designed for residence (nor any of the later poverty sided cabins) include any heating facilities.

Three additional “log cabins” are described as connecting storage sheds, each 13 ft. by 10 to 12 ft. The two sheds at the ends of the group probably originated as separate buildings. Logs placed between the original sheds formed the third shed. The eastern most of the three sections is of construction suggesting use as a granary with a door opening about 1 and 1/2 feet (the width of three logs) above the ground. The door itself is simply planks nailed to braces. The cabin at the west end has a single door opening which is at ground level with another door consisting of planks. The roofs of all three sections consist of dirt and sod materials. However, the logs of the middle shed show clear evidence of machine sawing, implying a somewhat later date, though, as described below, all three can be reasonably documented as having been on the site by 1913. The middle shed has no exterior doors but is entered through a door opening from the western most shed. A small door covering a hole in the ground stands just east of the three connected cabins.

A system of corrals at the north end of the complex is also of axe hewn log construction as is a fence which encompasses the entire ranch complex. The western portion of the corrals, in a circular shape, suggests that is was designed for horses. The eastern portion of the corrals which consist of parallel logs suggests use for cattle or other livestock. A portion of an irrigation ditch runs along the southern edge of the corral just north of the log sheds. All of the log construction is of hardwoods which were of the same species currently present along the stream. The most important is the box elder, a member of the maple family and quite common in the area. However, cottonwood trees, less useful for construction, are also present in numbers.

A small structure noted as a pavilion of 20 ft. by 15 ft. has a gabled roof of wooden frame construction, supported by upright logs, but no walls. Next to the pavilion is a circular plaza approximately 15 ft. in diameter which consists of flat stones. The stones surround a porcelain bathtub sunken to the ground level which served as a barbeque pit. A proper description of this feature is also that of a structure rather than a building. Neither the pavilion and the barbeque pit appear on any records of the Assessor’s office but the cattle operators added them, probably in the 1940s. Hence both are non-contributing to the nomination though present in the area.

Charles Simmons completed an application to take legal ownership of the lands under Homestead Laws, on February 10, 1913. This process is also called going to patent with the document showing the government’s grant of ownership called the final patent. He presented an inventory of the improvements that he had made on the land. Two other witnesses also appeared, as required by the Homestead Laws, who substantiated the inventory and other items in Simmons’s statement. In fact, they valued the improvements at $700; Simmons himself only gave $650. Also they noted the existence a lateral irrigation ditch, that Simmons omitted. Otherwise, they gave identical inventories.

Log House, 15′ x 15′
” Barn, 12′ x 20′
Cellar, 8′ x 10′
Log shop, 10′ x 12′
Pole corral, 30′ x 50′
Chicken house, 8′ x 8′
Hog-pen, 8′ x 10′
Log stable, 14′ x 16′
Pole fence, 1/2 mile,
900-1000′ lateral irrigation ditch.

A correlation of the above listing with the buildings and structures evident on the property is useful. The later owner of the ranch who had memory of it from a very early date stated in oral interviews that nothing had been removed except the chicken house and log stable, though other buildings were added later. Hence the inventory on the patent application needs to be reconciled with the observable earlier buildings on the site. With this fact in mind it is safe to say that the cabin on the 1913 inventory of 15′ x 15′ is probably the smaller log cabin as noted with additions from later times, though the actual measurement is 15′ x 13′, the number is close enough considering the nature of the records. Records at Duchesne Co. Assessor’s Office imply that the changes were made prior to 1940, a date substantiated by a later owner of the ranch. The Barn is probably the shed designated as a granary with the shed next to it. The dimensions of 24 ft. by 13 ft. are close enough to the measured dimensions of 20 ft. by 12 ft. in the original patent.

The third shed is probably the improvement noted in the 1913 inventory as a log shop since it fits the dimensions almost exactly. The covered hole just east of the sheds may well be the cellar. The pole fence of 1/2 mile is represented by several segments of wooden fence in the area, though some may have been replaced over the years. The Pole corral is still represented by the existing corral, though, again, some portions may have been replaced and the entire structure expanded. Conceivably the Hog pen of 8′ x 10 J was also in this area at the north end of the ranch. Even a portion of a 900 J to 1000′ lateral irrigation ditch probably survives along the south end of the existing corral, though only 50 J today. Presumably the original ditch extended farther to the east into fields of various crops. The only items from the 1913 inventory which can not be readily correlated with anything still present are the Log Stable and Chicken house, though a chicken yard is present on the eastern edge of the area next to the smaller log cabin.

The inventory does not list the larger log cabin, but the later owner of the ranch stated that the cabin dates from the time of occupancy by Charles Simmons, certainly to the 1920s and possibly earlier. The Assessor’s Office listed it from 1910 but that was obviously too early. The later owner also noted that his family had brought in and occupied the “poverty sided” ranch house and smaller “poverty sided” cabins in the 1940s. Hence this group of buildings are listed as “noncontributing” to the nomination though they were a functional part of the ranch at a later date and may be added to the site as “contributing” when time requirements are met within just a few years. (Indeed, a case can be made that these additional buildings could be designated as contributing at this time since they were part of the functional ranch for many years and date before 1940; quite possibly some years before 1940.

As a final listing, the following existing items are contributing as part of the original homestead as representing the first permanent European/American settlement in the area:

  • two room log cabin, c. 1920
  • one room log cabin, c. 1913, with porch addition, c. 1940
  • log granary, c. 1913
  • log shop, c. 1913
  • log storage shed, c. 1913 (counted as one building with the shop and granary)
  • log corral, c. 1913
  • irrigation ditch, c. 1913
  • cellar, c. 1913

The significance of the Remund Ranch as the oldest surviving European/American residence in the area of northwest Duchesne County, Utah, is documented by the records filed by Charles Simmons in the Homestead process which ultimately led to a full patent (grant of private ownership) by the U.S. General Land Office on June 26, 1913. (Rather typically, the owners did not file a copy of the patent document, no. 344144, with the Duchesne County Recorder until June 25, 1928, but it had legally been their property for fifteen years.) This is the earliest patent granted by the General Land Office under Homestead, Sale, or any other method in the entire region of the county, as revealed by the Recorder’s Office and a master file book of land patents in the National Archives. The area had been a part of the Uintah Reservation of the Ute Tribe until the early twentieth century when the General Land Office opened it to entry under the various land distribution laws. However, the Land Office did attach some additional restrictions directly into the patent that were not part of patents on typical federal lands.

The opening of previously withdrawn lands to Homestead is a major theme in the history of the Western U.S. A series of major “Land Rushes” in Oklahoma, formerly known as “Indian Territory,” have defined much of that State’s character. (Even the nickname “Sooner State” reflects the trick of a few slipping into an area “too soon” before legal opening to claim choice lands.) The U.S. Congress opened a portion of the Ute Tribes Uintah Reservation to non-Indian Homesteads by an Act of May 27, 1902. Members of the tribe selected lands: 80 acres per head of family, 40 for all other members. The purpose of opening the lands was to raise additional cash for the tribe which was “land poor.” The same act allotted some $70,064 to the tribe for various medical expenses then current. Further the Act specified that those entering the lands for the purpose of Homestead would have to fulfill the normal requirements under the famous Act of 1862 by constructing a cabin, residing on the site for five years as the only residence, and productively farming or ranching the land. However, in the case of former Ute Lands (and other former Reservation Lands opened under a variety of Acts of Congress), a Homesteader had to pay a fee of $1.25 per acre after the five years residency. In cases of “ordinary” Homesteads, the filing party could secure the land by paying the $1.25 fee per acre at anytime prior to completion of the five years but after that time the party had a two year period to file final paperwork and pay processing fees as the only monetary expense.

Though the Act opening the Uintah Reservation took effect on October 1, 1903, actual administrative enforcement of the provisions was delayed until July 1, 1905, when the General Land Office finally opened a facility to service the area. This office, at Vernal, Utah, administered a variety of government lands in the area. In the Utah case there was no dramatic “Land Rush” as had marked at least five openings in Oklahoma which have been recreated by Hollywood with claimants madly dashing over a starting line at an appointed time. In Oklahoma, large tracts of prairie with excellent wheat potential attracted large numbers of claimants from the start. On the former Ute lands, rugged topography made the great majority of the acreage useless for farming or ranching. However, there were some exceptions, including the site selected by Simmons, which was along a stream bottom. Claimants drifted into such sites over the ensuing years. Simmons was clearly one of the first to file a claim, on January 27, 1906, and take residency on June 25, 1906. It is impossible to state if he was the first to do so in the area, however, he was the first in what is now Duchesne County to actually complete the patent process, as noted above. In 1907 a large group of families arrived from Nebraska and began to improve homesteads. The Nebraskans were not alone. From July 1, 1906, to June 30, 1907, various claimants filed 331 documents for entry into former Ute lands. It should be noted that this area was considerably larger than that part of the Reservation which was ultimately placed in Duchesne County. The fact that few of these actually went to patent adds to the significance of the Simmons Homestead in this context.

The “log cabins” contribute to the theme of the site as intact, excellent, and representative examples typical of the dwellings of most early European/American residents. Though several other “log cabins” on other properties are known in Duchesne County, they have been removed from their original locations or are not as old. The prevalence of hand hewn logs in the two cabins that served as residences and two of what are now the log storage sheds is unusual for log cabins constructed by the twentieth century and is important physical evidence of the early date of settlement in the local area. Subsequent use of sawed logs at the Ranch emphasizes the significance.

The Simmons (Remund) Ranch proved successful from farming and, subsequently, from open range ranching. The popular media have frequently portrayed open range ranches, loosely described as operations which graze livestock on open, unfenced lands. However, there are relatively few such facilities in the Western States which have been so well preserved. The fact that the Ranch operated in such a capacity from its first settlement until relatively recently also adds to this aspect of its significance. The success of the Simmons (Remund) Ranch is most striking when contrasted to the operations of other immigrants who came to the area at about the same time. The Nebraska group noted earlier is particularly striking in this regard. Several families with origins in Nebraska are listed on the 1910 U.S. Census at the same time Simmons lived there. Even though the group included some well-to-do families for the times, with doctors and lawyers among the contingent, their efforts were mostly unsuccessful. Virtually the entire group returned to Nebraska before living on the parcels of land for the five years required for Homestead. Thus the date 1913 by which Charles Simmons had lived on the land long enough to fulfill the requirements for the full patent provision of Homestead, represented the approximate time that the Nebraska group was abandoning such ultimate prospect.

When Charles Simmons filed for his final Homestead in February, 1913, he listed himself as single, 31 years of age. By the time the officials in Washington approved the application in June, 1913, they issued the final patent to Charles and Hanna Simmons. This is a further testament to the success of Charles Simmons development of the ranch. The Simmonses went so far as to acquire additional adjacent lands under the Act of Congress of 1820 which allowed outright purchases (instead of the five year occupancy for Homestead). They filed for these purchases in 1917 but the Land Office did not issue their final patents until 1921, possibly because of the restrictions of release of former tribal reservation lands. The fact that the Simmonses had enough capital to make a land purchase, and chose to do so on adjacent lands, is further evidence of success.

Yet another suggestion of the success of the original Homesteader appears in his original patent application of 1913. In addition to the inventory of improvements noted in Sect. 7, Charles Simmons also presented a list of crops and acreages that he had cultivated over the years immediately prior to his final application. It should be noted that his application was for a total of 160 acres of land, considerably more than the area immediately around his cabins. He grew the following crops on the acreages noted, which totaled 25 ac. cleared and ready by 1912:

The steady increase in production is inescapable evidence of success.

The Simmonses may have leased the Ranch, or a portion of it, to a man named Hays in the 1920s or early 1930s. The recorder’s office shows a 1938 sale to H. Ray Knox and a 1946 resale to the Remund brothers, hence the Ranch name on the USGS topographic map.

However, Lloyd Remund stated that he and his brother had occupied the ranch as early as the 1930s though he could not provide an exact date. (A time lag of some years in recording of a property transfer is quite consistent with the earlier history of this particular parcel and of general practice in Duchesne County. Such a lag may also show final payment of a mortgage after some years.) The Remunds ran from 60 to 180 head of cattle. Earlier Hays had run as many as 300 goats for mohair production. Lloyd Remund stated that Hays was the builder of the circular portion of the corral since he also had horses, though some corral facilities existed in the area from the first Homestead. However, some corral facilities were clearly present earlier as shown by Simmons application. Both Hays and the Remunds had operated the ranch only in the summer. However, Lloyd Remund stated that the Simmonses had lived on the ranch year round at some times but had lived in town at others. He was uncertain as to whether they ultimately had any livestock production, though they grew crops from the initial entry. This seems consistent with the crop records through the years listed in the patent application. If Charles Simmons had produced livestock he would have listed it as well.

A final point from contemporary records on the original homesteader, Simmons, is of some interest. Charles Simmons listed himself as arriving on his homestead from Theodore, Utah. Two other homesteaders on nearby sites in 1906-1907 also listed themselves as arriving from the same community. They could well have been a loosely organized group but no conclusive support documents are available.

35 N 200 E

18 Thursday May 2023

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Duchesne County, Roosevelt, utah, Vintage Signs

35 North 200 East in Roosevelt, Utah

Utahn Cemetery

23 Thursday Mar 2023

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Cemeteries, Duchesne County, utah, Utahn

The cemetery for Utahn, Utah.

  • Cemeteries in Utah

Utahn, Utah

23 Thursday Mar 2023

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Duchesne County, utah, Utahn

Utahn, Utah

  • Cemetery

Arcadia, Utah

19 Saturday Nov 2022

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Arcadia, Duchesne County, utah

Arcadia, Utah was settled in 1908 and was previously called Red Cap for a local Utah Chief. It was later combined with Antelope to make Bridgeland.

Antelope, Utah

19 Saturday Nov 2022

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Antelope, Duchesne County, utah

Antelope was settled in 1905, there was a store and a service station. Later it was combined with Arcadia and Bridgeland was developed over both of them.

Lake Fork

15 Saturday Oct 2022

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bells, Duchesne County, DUP, Historic Markers, Post Offices, Upalco, utah

Lake Fork

After 1861 this area was an Indian Reservation until opened for settlement in 1905. Homesteaders arrived, cleared land, dug ditches, planted crops and built cabins. Home erected by David Richardson, moved here, became the first post office; Rhoda Barker Post Mistress. Bell adornment hunt in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints building erected on this site, also used for recreation and school, William Neal, first teacher. Lake Fork was renamed Upalco.

This is Daughters of Utah Pioneers markers #355 located in Upalco, Utah

Related:

  • D.U.P. Markers

Upalco, Utah

15 Saturday Oct 2022

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Duchesne County, Upalco, utah

Upalco, Utah

Formerly Lake Fork, Utah.

Related:

  • Lake Fork (D.U.P. Marker #355)

video

← Older posts

Follow Jacob

Follow Jacob

Blog Stats

  • 2,062,111 hits

Social and Other Links

BarlowLinks.com

Recent Posts

  • Arthur Miles Home
  • Navajo Shadehouse Museum
  • Impossible Canyons
  • The Old Hurricane Bell
  • Goulds Shearing Corral

Archives

Loading Comments...