• About JacobBarlow.com
  • Cemeteries in Utah
  • D.U.P. Markers
  • Doors
  • Exploring Utah Email List
  • Geocaching
  • Historic Marker Map
  • Links
  • Movie/TV Show Filming Locations
  • Oldest in Utah
  • Other Travels
  • Photos Then and Now
  • S.U.P. Markers
  • U.P.T.L.A. Markers
  • Utah Cities and Places.
  • Utah Homes for Sale
  • Utah Treasure Hunt

JacobBarlow.com

~ Exploring with Jacob Barlow

JacobBarlow.com

Tag Archives: Courthouses

Jackson County Courthouse

30 Thursday Apr 2026

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Courthouses, NRHP, Oregon Trail, Santa Fe Trail

Historic Truman Courthouse

This 1933 courthouse, inspired by Independence Hall, contains restored courtroom and office of former Presiding Judge Harry S. Truman. Often remodeled, this building rests upon a foundation laid in 1828.

Located at 112 West Lexington Avenue in The Square in Independence, Missouri and added to the National Register of Historic Places (#72000713) on October 18, 1972.

1827 Log Courthouse

31 Saturday Jan 2026

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Courthouses, Missouri

1827 Log Courthouse

Erected on the southeast corner of Lexington and Lynn Streets as a temporary home for Jackson County Government. This building has housed functions of the Jackson County Court as late as 1932 under Judge Harry S. Truman.

107 West Kansas Avenue in Independence, Missouri

The First Court House of Jackson County
Erected 1827
Donated to the City by Christian Ott, Jr.,
Mayor of Independence.
Removed to this site 1916.

Summit County Courthouse

31 Saturday Jan 2026

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Coalville, Courthouses, NRHP, summit county

Summit County Courthouse

Erected in 1903-04, the Summit County Courthouse stands out both architecturally, in the Romanesque Revival style, and politically as the symbol of the county’s growth and development at the beginning of the Twentieth Century.

The Summit County Courthouse is located at 54 North Main Street in Coalville, Utah and was added to the National Register of Historic Places (#78002694) on December 15, 1978.

In the fall of 1902, Summit County voters geared for a vote concerning the removal or retention of the County Seat in Coalville, Utah. Residents of Park City, a prosperous and booming silver mining camp, contended that since the town functioned as the county’s commercial center, it should be the county seat. Coalville citizens countered by stating it was their town that supplied the foodstuffs essential to Park City’s livelihood. It was ultimately put to the vote, with Coalville victorious.

Tensions between the two towns appeared to decrease after the vote. Apparently, one of the contentions of the Coalville supporters was that the then “present” courthouse was adequate. However, in May 1903, the Summit County Commissioners, Freeman Malin, J. C. Paskett, and William H. Smith decided unanimously to erect a new county building. Editorial ppinion in The Coalville Times quickly backed the action by stating: “While there are some in the county who will object to the erection of a new building we believe the majority will be in favor of the proposition, as it is believed that this will be the means of settling the county seat questions.”

The Park Record editorial countered by asserting “What the people of this and of the county ought to do, is to get up a petition protesting against this building and force the other end to live up to its election pledges.” Despite the joust, newspaper opinion from the Park eventually conceded that, although Park City was the proper place for it, the building as planned was “most conveniently arranged and is just what Summit County has needed for a long time.. .had it not been for a few measly and narrow minded ‘chumps’ who call themselves citizens, it would have been erected [in Park City], we nevertheless are glad the commissioners have decided to build…”

Shortly after the decision was made to build, the lot of J. S. Salmon, north of the L.D.S. Stake House, was purchased for $1,500.00 with the city presenting to the County part of its property adjoining the Salmon lot. A contract was awarded to F. C. Woods & Co. , Ogden architects, to design the structure; and it was speculated that the building would be constructed of white sandstone located in Summit County since the money for the material would then be kept in the county.

Ironically, the contractors selected were E. J. Beggs, of Park City, and J. H. Salmon, Coalville. Their low bid was $19,887.00; a Colorado firm had bid lower, but withdrew from competition. Salmon also owned the stone from which the courthouse would be constructed. County commissioners had visited Park City earlier with the plans for the building to seek approval that such approval be received was undoubtedly of high importance; and as stated, approval, at least in The Park Record, was eventually voiced.

Work commenced on the courthouse in August-September 1903. The making of brick began in early September; and work continued until mid-November, when it was discontinued for the winter months. Laborers returned to the job in the spring of 1904 and completed the building, which was turned over to the Summit County Commissioners in November 1904.

The Romanesque Revival style of the structure, marked by its fortress-like appearance, renders the building a unique and prominent feature of Coal vi lie’s Main Street area.

The building continues to function as the County Courthouse. Present plans call for an addition on the Courthouse which will enable the structure to continue to function as the county offices. Plans for the addition are being prepared by Sterling R. Lyon, Ogden, Utah, and illustrate a sympathy with the texture and style of the older structure. The jail, a separate building that sits behind the courthouse and built in the same style in 1905 by T. L. Allen, will be removed in order to make way for the addition. Although the jail will be lost, the addition will ensure the preservation of the courthouse, and its continued use.

The Summit County Courthouse is built in a Romanesque Revival style, typified by a rough textured, rock-faced coursed ashlar finish. The two and one-half story rectangular structure is topped by a broad hip roof with a centrally located-cross gable, to the west, which forms the main entry. The protruding entrance bay is characterized by a segmental arched entry arcade with colonettes,, and three-arched windows openings and deep set double-hung windows with transoms on the second level.

The stepped gable at the attic level is decorated with two pairs of volute buttresses. The two round arched windows in the gable have the same pronounced archivolt trim and impost course as the three windows below. The cornice of the entrance bay is not decorated with the dentil molding used on the rest of the cornice; instead, a dentilled cornice appears above the paired arched windows.

On the south façade, a second entry is marked by a square, slightly projecting tower. An unusual pre-modern element of the tower design is the flat, three-story recession in the south tower façade, giving it a very rectilinear appearance. The four gabled dormers in the pyramidal roof of the tower are faced in matching stone.

Emery County Court House

23 Thursday Oct 2025

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Castle Dale, Courthouses, Emery County, New Deal Funded, utah, WPA

Emery County Court House built in 1938-39 as one of Utah’s WPA New Deal Projects.

95 East Main Street in Castle Dale, Utah

Lincoln County Court House

06 Wednesday Mar 2024

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Courthouses

Lincoln County Court House

Erected 1938

181 Main Street in Pioche, Nevada

Tooele County Courthouse and City Hall

14 Thursday Dec 2023

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

City Hall Buildings, Courthouses, Historic Buildings, NRHP, Tooele, Tooele County, utah

Tooele County Courthouse and City Hall

The Tooele County Courthouse and City Hall was added to the National Historic Register (#83003194) on July 21, 1983 and is located at 41 East Vine Street in Tooele, Utah.

Pioneer City Hall – DUP Historic Marker #84 is located here.

This Greek Revival temple-form building was constructed in 1867 using local stone. The belfry, added sometime after 1874, is Picturesque in style and has lathe-turned posts accentuated by scroll brackets, a distinctive spindle band, and a slightly bellcast pyramid roof. The hall was built, according to a newspaper article of the time, by the citizens of Tooele “for a dancing hall, for dramatic representations and other social and intellectual purposes.” It was leased to William C. Foster and Thomas Croft but was also used for holding court and other city and county business. Live entertainment, however, proved financially unsuccessful, and by 1871 the hall was utilized primarily as a courthouse. In 1899 a new courthouse was constructed, and the building became solely the city hall. In 1942, with the construction of a new city hall, it was authorized for use as a museum by the Daughters of the Utah Pioneers.

The text below is from the nomination form from when it was added to the register.

The Tooele County Courthouse and City Hall, built in 1867, is significant as an important governmental building in the historical development of Tooele County, Utah, and as an excellent example of an early city hall-county courthouse in the state. It is one of fourteen such structures documented and remains both the oldest (known to date) and only extant temple-form city hall in Utah The temple-form, which typically has its short end to the street and a pedimented gable façade in imitation of monumental classical buildings, originated in the Greek Revival period of American building, and was the first and most common building type used in Utah’s early public buildings. Tooele County, located immediately west of Salt Lake County, was organized in the 1851-52 period, some four years after the founding of Salt Lake City by Mormon pioneers. Within the county political framework, Tooele City functioned as the center, but did not gain votes as the County Seat until 1861, and did not become the effective location of county government until 1867, upon completion of this building. The red sandstone, rectangular structure, topped by a belfry (post-1874), also served as an early pioneer social center. It functioned as a courthouse and city hall until 1899, and as city hall until 1944; thus, the Tooele County Courthouse and City Hall formed a central link in the community’s social and political life. In 1968 the building was recorded by the Historic American Buildings Survey.

Tooele County, located approximately twenty-five miles west of Salt Lake City, and extending to the Nevada border, formed one of the earliest units of government in Utah. Settlement in the area reportedly occurred in 1849, with agricultural and milling activity dominant. Within this early period, Mormon ecclesiastical authority also served political purposes; but in 1851 Tooele County was organized and the “first” civil political government in the county was formed in 1852. Although Tooele City, incorporated on January 3, 1853 — the fifth incorporated settlement in Utah was the predominant settlement, the Territorial legislature placed the county seat at Richville. However, in 1861 that act was repealed and citizens voted to make Tooele City the seat of county government. County court continued to be held alternately in Tooele, Richville, and Grantsville until 1867 when the new building was constructed in Tooele to house county facilities.

The structure was built in 1867 of red sandstone, in an uncoursed rubble masonry construction. Interestingly, this time marked a transitional period in building materials and ideas of permanence in the Tooele area. Writing from Tooele in March, 1867, Eli B. Kelsey stated:

The time honored “adobe” is fast loosing [sic] prestige as a building material, and brick and rock are rapidly taking its place. The primitive log cabin, with its turf roof, is fast approaching its destiny, namely, to shelter the lower orders of the animal creation for a little season, and then become one of the things of the past, while the “genus homo” find refuge in structures of brick and stone, with shingle roofs.

In August, 1867 a newspaper article reported that the citizens of Tooele were constructing a social and multi-purpose hall, which was “being done by shares.” The notice continued, “the house is substantially built of rock; its dimensions, 60 x 30. It will be used for a dancing hall, for dramatic representations and other social and intellectual purposes. It is estimated that this building will cost twelve thousand dollars.” In addition, the structure was to house county and city records, and form a type of community center.

According to one source, bids to erect the structure were actually submitted to county officials on February 13, 1865. Those involved in the construction were: Isaac Lee, James Hammond, W. C. Gollaher, and John Gordan. The architect is unknown. A basement was then excavated, where a jail was to be located, and a foundation laid. A Tooele County history noted that a two-room structure started by Isaac Lee, one of the contractors, was purchased and placed on the foundation. Finish work was then completed, including the plastering of the interior by George Atkin and George W. Bryan.

In describing the building’s use, the Daughters of Utah Pioneers, History of Tooele County, records:

Upon the completion of these two rooms, it was decided that the building might serve as the general entertainment and amusement center for the community, inasmuch as no such building was then available and could also be used for purposes of holding court or transacting any city or county business also. A committee was appointed to consider any suggestions or offers from anyone who might be interested. An offer of leasing the building to present home dramatic plays and entertainments was made by William C. Foster and Thomas Croft, and was considered favorable by the council.

On December 25, 1870, the first entertainment was held in this building and the leasors offered a rental of $400.00 for the building. However, due to hard times the financial end of the project was not so good, and in April of 1871, the leasors appeared before the council and petitioned them to be merciful, and offered all the furnishings they had acquired for dramatic purposes in payment of the overdue rent. This petition was accepted and the building was from then on used as a court house except for special entertainments given on very special occasions.

. . .it became necessary to build onto the building to enlarge the jail quarters. The Tooele City officials then petitioned the county officials to permit them to use a portion of the building for city offices. This was granted.

Thus, the Tooele County Courthouse and City Hall continued to function as such until 1899. At that time a new court house was built and the county moved into that facility. The structure then became solely the City Hall, until 1941 when Tooele City erected a new building. In 1942 the city leased the 1867 structure to the Daughters of Utah Pioneers for fifty years. That group utilizes the hall as a museum.

The Old City Hall is a Greek Revival inspired temple-form stone building. It was built in 1867 of uncoursed rubble masonry containing some red sandstone. The building is a rectangular form (27′-3″ x 66′-5″), one story in height at the front, and two stories at the rear. It has a gable roof. A belfry was added sometime after 1874.

This building is oriented with its gable end toward the street, a typical characteristic of temple-form buildings. It has a heavy wooden cornice, and a door is centered between two windows on the façade. A round date stone is located in the point of the gable over the door. Each of the openings on the façade has a semicircular relieving arch of stone, and the date stone is also surrounded by a ring of stone pieces. The windows are the two over two double hung sash type. There is a segmented transom over the door.

Originally the building had three long, narrow windows on the east and west side walls. A window on the east wall was later enlarged to contain an inset door, providing additional access to the interior of the building. A modern addition, made in the 1970s which connects the old courthouse to the city library, resulted in covering two of the windows on the west wall. These changes, however, have not affected the original integrity of the building. The door in the east wall was added well within the historic period, and the brick addition attached to the rear of the west side is unobtrusive, and has provided access to the building, so that it may function as part of a cultural complex.

The belfry, reflecting the influence of the Picturesque movement which followed the period of the Greek Revival, has lathe turned posts accented by scroll brackets, and a distinctive spindle band. It has a slightly bellcast pyramid roof. The addition of the belfry may have been an attempt by the Tooele townspeople to highlight the building in the Victorian period when because of its small scale it would not have been as distinctive among the larger buildings of the period. It may also represent an attempt to bring the building up to date using decorative features of the period. Or, it may have been added strictly for practical reasons, and was designed using the most typical decorative features of the period.

The Old City Hall in Tooele is an excellent, well preserved example of a Greek Revival inspired temple-form building. It has received alterations, previously mentioned, which were made to allow it continual use, but which do not affect the original integrity of the building.

Price Municipal Building

01 Saturday Apr 2023

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Carbon County, Courthouses, Murals, NRHP, Price, utah

Price Municipal Building

The Municipal Building was constructed 1938-1939. The construction was funded with $85,000 provided by the city and a $90,000 federal grant from the Works Progress Association. The building is significant as one of the largest buildings constructed in Utah under the WPA Program and for the mural depicting the history of early Carbon County painted on the four walls of the foyer as part of the Federal Arts Project of the WPA by the Price-born artist, Lynn Fausett.

185 East Main Street in Price, Utah.

From the National Register’s nomination form:

The Price Municipal Building is a two-story flat-roofed structure of irregular shape (roughly rectangular) constructed of concrete and light-colored brick. The building houses offices for Price City, which are located on both the first and second floors, an auditorium, handball court and gymnasium, which has been converted into a museum. Located in the northeast corner of the building is a garage which originally served as a fire station. Constructed with the use of WPA funds during the late 1930s, the building is architecturally similar to other municipal buildings constructed during this time period. There are two main entrances to the building, one on the north along Main Street which enters the main office area and the second on the west side of 200 East, which enters the foyer and provides access to the theater and gymnasium. The foyer is the location of the Lynn Fausett mural depicting the history of the area.

The Price Mural

Following an absence from Utah of sixteen years, Lynn Fausett returned to his home town of Price in 1938. Discouraged by his recent divorce and the bleak prospects for success as an artist in his native state, the Price mural was a turning point in his career. The mural depicts events and themes significant in the history of Carbon County. The mural is painted on all four sides of the building’s foyer. The four foot high mural occupied some 200 feet of wall space. Regarding the mural Donald Hague writes: , “The principal figures within the mural are approximately one half size. There are some 82 figures throughout the painting discounting the many smaller figures which appear in deep perspective in the background. The artist worked from photographs, tintypes, and personal recollection in recreating the characters portrayed. The mural, in affect, offered Lynn the opportunity to totally submerge himself in a subject with which he had deep personal ties. It allowed him, he said, to maintain his sanity during the stress of divorce, and separation from his children, and in another sense permitted him to relive his childhood through the mural.”

James L. Hazeltin, in his book One Hundred Years of Utah Painting, observes, “It is surprising to learn that after seeing reproductions of the Price mural, it is only 4 feet: high, for it is difficult to obtain monumentality in a narrow strip encompassing a low-ceilinged room. Fausett has done it, and maintained the two-dimensionality of the wall, with an unusual blend of Rubenesque form and Piero della Francescan mood and color.”

The first scene of the mural, located on the west wall, depicts Abram Powell and Caleb Rhodes who entered the area as trappers in 1877. The cabin constructed by Abram Powell on the Price River in 1877 is shown as well as the dugout built by Caleb Rhodes in the area of present-day Carbonville. The two men remained on the Price River until early 1878 when they returned to their homes in Salem. In December of 1878 Abram Powell was killed by a bear on Mt. Nebo and his brother, John Powell, took up the Abram Powell homestead in 1879. The return of Caleb Rhodes and John Powell with their families in 1879 marked the beginning of a permanent settlement in the area. This event is depicted by a newly constructed dugout with an adjacent covered wagon and man plowing in the background.

The second scene depicts the construction of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad through the area in 1882-1883. The painting shows both Chinese and European workers laying rails with the familiar cliffs and mountains in the background. The completion of the railroad between Salt Lake City and Denver was not only of importance to the entire state, as it served to end the monopoly of the transportation system by the Union Pacific Railroad, but of great local importance as it brought in a large number of new settlers, men to freight from the Price depot to the more isolated parts of eastern and southeastern Utah, and miners to dig for coal in the newly opened mines at Castle Gate and Sunnyside.

The third scene shows the store and post office built by Fred Grames in 1883. Grames is shown with W. H. Branch surveying the Price Canal in 1884. Their instrument was a level tripod with two lamp chimneys filled with water. Sighting through the lamps the two men laid out and surveyed a course which is still followed by the canal. To the right of the two men is shown the original log meetinghouse. Constructed in 1884, it served as church, town hall, and school.

The fourth scene is of a group of freighters at their campgrounds located near the railyards. After completion of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad in 1883 Price became the rail head for shipping goods into the vast area to the north and east known as the Unita Basin. Freighters carried supplies to the Uintah-Ouray Indian Reservation and Fort Duchesne. After the discovery of gilsonite the wagons hauled gilsonite from the Uinta Basin to Price where it was shipped by rail. Men included in the scene are A. J. Lee, manager of the Gilsonite Company; Chuck Fausett, a freighter and uncle of the artist Lynn Fausett; Bert McMullin, a freighter and another uncle of Lynn Fausett; Matt Warner, a former companion of Butch Cassidy and later marshall of Price; Henry Kelsey, another freighter; Sam Gilson, the developer of the gilsonite industry is shown in his familiar Prince Albert coat; Oz Barlow, another freighter is also pictured.

The fifth scene, located on the north wall, is a view of the Price East Main Street in 1892. The dominent building in the scene is the Price Trading Company store where both of the artist’s parents worked. Lynn Fausett’s mother, Josephine Bryner Fausett, is pictured in the doorway of the store wearing a white apron.

The sixth scene is a group of seven people, A. W. Horsley, C. H. Taylor, A. Bollinger, an unidentified woman with a child, E. S. Horsley, and Isabell Birch Bryner. In the scene Mrs. Bryner is holding a petition to incorporate the town of Price. According to the account, by 1892 all the men had used up their homestead rights for farms and Mrs. Bryner, a widow, was asked by the local people to use her homestead right to file on the property which had been chosen for a townsite. Threatened by reports that someone else was headed to Salt Lake City to file on the proposed townsite, Mrs. Bryner was rushed to Salt Lake City by train to file on the land. She was successful in obtaining the land which was then sold into lots.

The seventh scene, located on the east wall, is a portrait of J. M. Whitmore, a prominent early rancher and first president of the town board. In the background is the first town hall.

The eighth scene depicts the religious history of the community. The three leaders of the dominant non-Mormon religions, the Catholic Bishop Lawrence Scanlan, the Greek Orthodox Priest Reverend Mark Petrakis and the Methodist Minister Reverend R. P. Nichols, are shown in a group portrait. To the right are illustrations of the Notre Dame de Lourdes Catholic Church in Price, constructed between 1918 and 1923; the Price Academy Building, a school operated by Reverend Nichols; and, the Greek Orthodox Church of the Assumption, completed in 1916. The Mormon story is portrayed in a scene showing the organization of the Mormons in 1882 by Bishop George Frandsen. The figures in the scene are Mrs. George Robb (with baby), George Robb behind his wife, Grandmother Mud in a bonnet, Mr. and Mrs. Henry Empey sitting next to the table, E. W. Mclntire, first counselor to Bishop George Frandsen is sitting behind the table, Soren Olsen, the ward clerk, is sitting at the table. The rest are unidentified.

The ninth scene illustrates the theme of law. Justice of the Peace Erastus W. Mclntire is shown conducting the community’s first marriage between Gilbert Peterson and his bride Ann. Mrs. Mclntire is present and the best man and Mclntire’s son are shown holding the pigs which were brought as payment for the marriage fees. In the background is the old Carbon County Courthouse with its statue of Justice atop the building.

The tenth scene concerns the theme of education. Two of the town’s early school buildings are shown and a group portrait includes Sally Ann Olsen, the first school teacher, collecting children in her buckboard; W. J. Tidwell, who surveyed the Price townsite and became the first public school teacher; L. M. Olsen, the first superintendent of schools; and Joseph Birch who sponsored in the Utah Legislature a bill providing for free public education. Another setting shows Carl R. Marcusen, principal of the Price Public School and later president of the Board of Education. Behind Marcusen is the old Carbon High School with the still familiar “Block C” located on the cliffs behind the school.

The eleventh scene shows Lynn Fausett as a small boy leading his blind grandfather Haws Ulrich Bryner.

The twelth scene, located on the south wall, shows W. Grant Olsen, first mayor of Price in 1911. A community promoter, Olsen is shown planting trees in the new Price City Park. In the background is a statue of a pioneer woman executed by Dean Fausett, brother of Lynn Fausett.

The thirteenth scene depicts a Fourth of July parade in 1911. Shown are two horse-drawn floats and the marching band.

The fourteenth scene commemorates the importance of the coal industry to the county. The first setting shows two men working at the Sunnyside coke ovens in 1917. Coke from the Carbon County area was of prime importance to the smelting industry of Utah. The next setting shows three miners emerging from a mine tunnel. Both the American-born and southern European miners are represented in the picture. The third setting shows the outside workings at Sunnyside in 1917. World War I brought a tremendous expansion of the Carbon County coal industry and the setting depicts the activity which characterized the coal industry during this period.

Statement of Significance

The Price Municipal Building is of significance primarily because of the mural depicting the area’s history which was painted as a Utah WPA arts project by the noted Utah artist Lynn Fausett. The mural represents the best work of art produced during the WPA art project in Utah and is of great value as a historical document in portraying the themes and personalities of the area’s early history. The building itself was one of the largest WPA buildings constructed in Utah. Architecturally the building is a good representative of the international design for public buildings during the last half of the 1930s.

History

On June 8, 1936, the Price City Council authorized an application to the Works Progress Association for a loan and grant to aid in financing the construction of a municipal building. Lewis T. Cannon and John Fetzer were architects for the building, and under their advice Price City requested a $67,500 grant from the WPA which would cover forty-five percent of the estimated $150,000 project. Under WPA requirements projects would have to be supported by a fifty-five percent local expenditure.

In order to receive the grant Price officials would have to provide a local match of $82,500.00. A bond election was held April 2, 1937, and with a thirty-five percent turn out Price voters accepted the City Council proposal to issue $85,000 in bonds for construction of the City Hall and public auditorium. The rendered vote was 200 for the project with 42 opposed. Fifteen months after the initial application Price received the WPA grant for $67,500.00.

Bids for the construction were opened on January 3, 1938, and the Price firm of Fausett and Pessetto was awarded the contract for $139,936.42. A week after the bid was awarded, Councilman W. E. Mclntire proposed that Price City draw up a project for mural paintings by Lynn Fausett in the Municipal Building. The motion carried, and City authorized a sum of $350.00 to launch the project. Plans for the building proceeded rapidly, and the laying of the cornerstone occurred on April 7, 1938.

The original estimate of $150,000.00 was too low, and therefore the first contract did not include the gymnasium. On October 10, 1938, the WPA increased its grant for the total project to $90,000.00. This allowed for awarding a second contract to complete the gymnasium. Announced on November 5, 1938, the gymnasium contract was awarded the firm of Fausett and Pessetto whose bid of $29,900.00 was the lowest.

A severe winter required that a thirty-day extension be granted to Fausett and Pessetto, and the gymnasium was completed in the early spring of 1939. However with the city hall and auditorium completed dedication ceremonies were held on February 22, 1939, Washington’s Birthday.

Architecturally the building is a good example of the adaptation of the International style in the construction of public buildings in Utah during the late 1930s. The Price Municipal Building is significant as one of the largest buildings constructed in Utah under the WPA program. In addition the building was constructed during J. Bracken Lee’s tenure as mayor of Price and is probably the best tangible reminder of his service as mayor of his hometown from 1935 to 1947. J. Bracken Lee later served as Governor of Utah from 1949 to 1956 and mayor of Salt Lake City from 1960 to 1970.

However, the Price Municipal Building is best known for the 4′ x 200′ mural located on the four walls of the foyer of the Municipal Building. The mural, painted by Lynn Fausett, depicts the early history of Carbon County.

Born February 27, 1894, in Price, Utdji, Lynn Fausett received a high school diploma in art from Brigham Young Academy in 1912 then returned for an additional year at Carbon County High School. He attended the University of Utah from 1914 until 1916 when he joined the Navy and served until 1921.

Returning to Utah he was employed as an engineer by the Utah Power and Light Company for one year until he decided to pursue his real desire of art. Quitting his job, he hitchhiked to San Francisco where, using the experience he had gained in the Navy, he shipped on a freighter bound for New York. Upon his arrival in New York he began his art training with the Art Students League. To support himself he worked as a night report clerk for the Fifth Avenue Bus Company. Studying under Kenneth Hayes Miller, Lynn Fausett began a life-long quest to discover the techniques which would enable him to paint “like the old masters.” Following the completion of his studies in 1927 he worked with the Hildreth Meiene Studio and served as a member of the Board of Control for the Art Students League. In December of 1932 he was elected president of the Art Students League and served from 1933 to 1936. In evaluating his tenure as president, the Art Student League News found “Lynn Fausett was the right president at the right time. The League, in those early Depression years, was reeling from the clashes of artistic rivalries on the staff and in the membership, and was also in bad shape financially, During his Presidency the League liberalized its requirements for League membership and placed a three-year limitation on Board membership. Prior to this change in the League’s by-laws, there had been occasions when the Board had tended to freeze into the reflection of a single point of view, with the result that the League’s teaching staff was inclined to become narrow. Under Fausett the league embarked on a greatly broadened type of teaching, and there began to be radically different points of view on the staff. This is a condition which continues today.”

Although he did some small works during his stay in New York, most of his energies were devoted to several murals for which the Meiere Studios were commissioned.

His stature as a mural painter was recognized when he was elected to the Board of Control of the National Society of Mural Painters in 1936. In addition, despite the severe depression which touched so many talented artists, Lynn Fausett found sufficient work that his association with the federal government’s relief program for artists came quite late in’ the WPA program. His biographer, Donald Hague, writes, “Yet Lynn Fausett might well be termed a latecomer in regard to the federal government’s public relief program, he finally appearing only in the final act of a rather long, and complex Depression arts drama. In fact, had Lynn’s promising career not been shattered by divorce, the success and steady progress he had made from 1922 to 1938 would probably have ruled out his becoming involved in the Federal Art Project of the WPA at all for which the people of Utah, Wyoming and Nevada would have been the poorer today.”

Upon returning to his native Price, Lynn Fausett contacted some of his old friends and proposed the idea of murals for the foyer of the new Municipal Building. Despite the objections of Mayor J. Bracken Lee to decorating public buildings, Fausett found an ally in Councilman W. E. (Ted) Mclntire and he succeeded in persuading a majority of the council members to support the project. As the mural was underway, Mayor Lee became one of the strongest supporters of the project. Work on the mural involved nearly two years total work, although several other commissions were sandwiched in between. Lynn Fausett received about $1600.00 for the Price mural between 1938 and 1941.

The mural traces the history of Carbon County from its initial settlement in 1877, the coming of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad in 1883, the heyday of the coal mines in 1917, and the founding and expansion of Price as a community.

While work proceeded on the Price mural, Lynn Fausett was involved in work on three other murals under the Utah WPA art project: one for the Union Building at the University of Wyoming; another for White Pine High School in Ely, Nevada; and the last a reproduction of an aboriginal pictograph from Barrier Canyon. The Barrier Canyon pictograph murals include two separate canvases. The larger 12′ x 60′ is on display at the Utah Museum of Natural History while the smaller canvas, 12′ x 20′, is on display at the Prehistoric Museum in Price which is housed in the Gymnasium of the Price Municipal Building.

The WPA art project ended on June 30, 1943, and, according to Donald Hague, “this brought to an end an era of excitement and innovation in the arts which aside from the financial boost it gave the economy, provided what might be termed a minor Renaissance in the United States.

With the close of the WPA art project, Lynn Fausett took a position as Art Director of the Special Services Branch, Ninth Service Command at Fort Douglas. He remained there until 1946. During this period he painted a mural entitled “Utah’s First Tank.” The 6′ x 22′ mural was placed in the Fort Douglas NCO Club and depicts a battle between Mormon settlers and Indians in which the Mormons used a V-shaped sledge to advance on the Indians.

After World War II he took to easel painting to earn his livelihood and became well known for his Western Landscapes. At the 1947 Annual Exhibition of the Utah Institute of Fine Arts he won first prize for a picture entitled “The Old Log Barn.” The next year the San Antonio Express Magazine described his work in the following manner: “In his canvases one sees the stuff of which the West is made, the mountains with their thick covering of trees, the far-revealing plains, the soft blue skies, the eroded cliffs of the desert country.”

The easel paintings interspersed work on several murals including the 8′ x 16′ Kennocott Mural in 1951; the Harman’s Cafe Murals at 1300 East and 2100 South, Salt Lake City, which include three 4’6″ x 13′ murals entitled, “Pony Express Riders Passing two Pioneer Wagons” completed in 1955; “Handcart Pioneers” completed in 1956; “The Ute Rangers” completed in 1956. The Harman’s loft murals at North Temple Street which include a 6′ x 30′ mural entitled “Dead Horse Point” completed in 1956 and the 5′ x 25′ “Brighton” completed in 1958.

His last work, the Pioneer Trek Mural, was completed for the “This is The Place Monument” information building in 1959-1960. It includes three panels, two 10′ x 10′ panels entitled “Flight from Nauvoo” and “First Glimpse of the Salt Lake Valley from Big Mountain” and one 10′ x 31′ panel entitled “On the Trail Near Fort Laramie with Brigham Young in Command.”

Earlier, in 1941, he had completed an 8′ x 25′ mural for the Farmington Chapel commemorating the founding of the LDS Church Primary Association. Mr. Fausett had hoped the mural would lead to other opportunities to use his artistic ability to depict church history. However, church policy during those years did not recognize the usefulness of art in meeting its needs, and Mr. Fausett focused primarily on landscapes until the Pioneer Trek Murals were commissioned.

Unfortunately by the beginning of the 1960s Mr. Fausett had begun to suffer health problems. Cataracts dimmed his vision and several strokes weakened him physically. A partial recovery enabled him to return to Price in 1966 to do restoration work on the Price Murals.

His biographer, Donald Hague, writes, “Recognition of his work has been well and hard earned. . . but most of all, it has been legitimate. He can be numbered among the few artists who have been able, apart from my teaching position, to pursue a successful career as a painter.”

The Price Mural is the most significant work executed during the WPA Art Project in Utah and ranks as one of the most important works completed in the nation under this New Deal Program. Lynn Fausett’s work on the Price Mural is a fitting representative of the course which the WPA Art Project followed as outlined by Holger Cahill, first director of the Work Progress Administration’s Federal Art Project. “The fact that the Federal Art Project has made it possible for hundreds of artists to work in their home environments has led to interesting developments in many parts of the country. Heretofore certain regions have been barren of art and art interest because of the constant drift of talent toward the already overcrowded art centers in the East. The Project has helped to counteract this movement. One result has been that a great deal of latent local interest has been brought to the surface and stimulated into healthy activity. Another is that many little-known aspects of this extraordinarily varied country of ours have been brought into the current of art. Through this we are discovering that the country differs considerably from the ‘standardized America’ which was so thoroughly advertised in the recent past. There has been no attempt under the Project to foster a ‘regional art’, assuming that a regional art is possible in this day of easy transportation. But art that is related to the history or the local color of a region has been encouraged where this has seemed a natural expression of the artist.”

Regarding the Price Murals, Holger Cahill was reported saying during his visit to Price, “No better murals were being painted in America.’

The Price Mural is an important historical document which preserves and portrays much of the color and flavor of the region’s history. The mural gives a unique sense of acquaintance and understanding of the local history. It has been a source of great local pride and city officials have voiced a strong commitment to its preservation and protection.

Beaver County Courthouse.

04 Saturday Mar 2023

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Beaver, Beaver County, Courthouses, NRHP, utah

Beaver County had been created by the Territorial Legislature in 1855. General management of the county was entrusted to the County Court which consisted of a probate judge and three selectmen, who jointly possessed the power of the County Commissions today. In 1876 the 6,000 inhabitants of the county elected to build Beaver County Courthouse to house the Second Judicial District Court of the Territory of Utah.

Because of Indian unrest during the Black Hawk War, the trials of John D. Lee, associated with the Mountain Meadows Massacre, and a general desire on the part of the Federal government to maintain a watchful eye over “Mormons” to the south, both the courthouse, the seat of Federal authority, and Fort Cameron, with Federal troops nearby, played significant roles in the lives of these early Utahns. In fact, William Stokes, a former Union soldier, directed the building of the courthouse. The architect is unknown.

Although begun in 18?6, the courthouse was not completed until 1882, at a cost of $10,960. Fire partially destroyed the structure in 1889, but it was soon rebuilt with many improvements. Later additions to the
rear include a 32′ x 29′ vault and a jail.

The second trail of John D. Lee was held in the Second Judicial District Court In Beaver, U.T. during December 1876, The courthouse, only in early excavation stages at the time, was not the site for these trials.

Nevertheless, this lovely courthouse remains in use today by Beaver County, an emblem of the pretentious construction in public buildings during the Territorial period. It also symbolizes the Federal Government’s attempts to govern and “observe” the Mormons during a period when the practice of Polygamy heightened those conflicts.

Located at 90 East Center Street in Beaver, Utah and added to the National Historic Register (#70000622) on October 6, 1970.

  • Beaver Territorial Courthouse (D.U.P. Historic Marker)

Las Vegas Post Office and Courthouse

18 Sunday Dec 2022

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Clark County, Classical Revival, Courthouses, Historic Buildings, Las Vegas, Nevada, New Deal Funded, NRHP, Post Offices, PWA Projects

Las Vegas Post Office and Courthouse

The significance of the Federal Building/Post Office in Las Vegas rests upon the building’s intrinsic and representational values on a local level to the city. These values lie in two areas: architecture and politics/government. Architecturally, the building is representative of the eclectic revivalism which distinguished most public buildings designed by the Treasury Department’s Supervising Architect’s office in the 1920s and 1930s. Although it may not have succeeded in its intended role as an exemplar of good taste to be imitated by subsequent private structures (the most famous of which, of course, are the amazingly profligate casinos), the building is the most refined of Las Vegas Depression-era architecture. It is a well-preserved and locally prominent example of its genre – a medium-scale public building of the early thirties. The Federal Building also represents the city’s part of an extensive federal building program initiated in the late 1920s by the Hoover administration – the forerunner to Roosevelt’s Public Works Administration. Like the immense Boulder Dam project, under construction at the same time, this building presented a locally prominent symbol of the presence of the federal government, and as the first federal
building erected in Las Vegas, it is a source of pride for the city and a locally prominent landmark.

The building was added to the National Historic Register (#83001108) on February 10, 1983, it is located at 300 Stewart Avenue in Las Vegas, Nevada and is now home to the Mob Museum.

  • Mob Museum

Although the Federal Building completed in 1933 was the first civil federal structure erected in Las Vegas by the Treasury Department, it was not the first building put up specifically to house the postal facility. The 1933 building was preceded only four years by another. Actually, boosting for a federal building had begun two decades earlier in 1911 with the hope that Congress would include Las Vegas among the hundreds of communities across the country to receive post offices and courthouses. The government at the time was engaged in a fifteen-year construction binge which had begun around the turn of the century; however, increasingly vociferous criticism of porkbarrel politics dampened the enthusiasm in Congress for new building projects, and by the mid-1910s the program was halted. Las Vegas did not receive its building.

The Federal Building/Post Office (originally called the U.S. Post Office and Courthouse; called Federal Building in this nomination) is situated within the sprawling urban setting of the desert city of Las Vegas. The building is located on the north side of Stewart Avenue on a site which is, atypically, not a corner site; it is centered on third-Street (almost – see Addendum, Item 8) with a vista down the street intended to be grandiose. Located in a six-block Civic Center just north of the central business district, the Federal Building sits among several city buildings, including the ten-story new City Hall to the east. Four blocks south are the Clark County Courthouse and the more recent Federal Courthouse. The Federal Building is surrounded by paved parking lots: public lots to the east, west and south and a parking/loading area behind the building to the north. To the southwest is the Lady Luck Casino Dealer’s School, a single-story structure with stucco walls and a red tile roof; beside that to the west is the six-story concrete Binion’s Horseshoe Casino parking garage, and beside that is the Del Webb’s Mint parking garage, also six stories.

The building is faced south-southwest toward Stewart Street and is set back from the sidewalk in a small grassed lawn as is typical for a federal building of the period. Most of this lawn in the front has been taken up by the wide granite stair which ascends from the sidewalk to the raised first floor level and by the concrete handicapped ramp west of the central stair. Trees have been planted alongside the building on its front and two sides, set within the small grassy areas which remain, and site furniture consists of the handrails for the stairs and ramps.

The Federal Building itself is massed as a great three story block, 119’10” wide by 76’0″ deep. The front façade features a central colonnade flanked on both sides by massive end bays. This enframed block configuration – central colonnade or arcade anchored on both sides by symmetrical solid corner elements – is an arrangement developed in 18th century France and adapted by American government and private architects in the late 19th and early 20th centuries for a wide variety of public and institutional buildings. The neoclassical arrangement took on several appearances as the architects varied the scale, proportion and detailing, but at its core it represented the type of classicism favored by the Treasury Department as appropriate for federal architecture. The building also displays the classical vertical hierarchy of base, body and cap – the base formed by the raised foundation, the body by the brick walls and great colonnade and the cap by the entablature and parapet. The building represents mainline, albeit eclectic, neoclassicism with its large flat-sided Ionic columns, formal loggia (since altered), classical moulded and dentiled entablature and Georgian balustraded parapet. It is typical of the hundreds of similar structures
designed by the Supervising Architect’s office of the Treasury, but the refinement of proportions, details and use of materials and the building’s size distinguish the Las Vegas Federal Building as a regionally important example of the style.

The building is covered with a flat concrete slab roof, with composition roofing over; the roof is bordered with a parapet, a Georgian Revival element made up of terra cotta components. Classified as a fireproof structure, it is supported by a structural steel frame which holds pan type concrete floor and roof slabs. All
of the four facades are organized with typical neoclassical symmetry, with the front and sides featuring the prominent colonnades. These are the focal points for the building, made up of terra cotta parts which give stylistic distinction to what would otherwise be a plain brick box. The front colonnade has eight massive columns, the sides six. Each column is engaged by the wall behind, flat-sided and fluted, with Ionic capital, compound moulded base and plain plinth. The front colonnade is set within a terra cotta-faced bay which projects slightly from the end bays; the side colonnades are flush with the wall, with no projection, and all three colonnades are placed in the second and third floors, a design device which gives the building a more imposing countenance. The first floor is faced with flat terra cotta panels, punctuated by simply framed windows on the east and west facades and by a six-bay arcade on the south (front). This
arcade was originally open, leading into a shallow loggia which in turn enters into the main lobby, but the openings have since been infilled with aluminum window/doors to create an entry vestibule. The rear façade is dominated by the large first-floor loading dock with cantilevered metal canopy over. The dock extends the width of a central bay which projects several feet beyond the flanking symmetrical sides. Centered in this bay are three large Georgian windows with a smaller window on each side. Like the front and sides, the rear features terra cotta siding on the first floor level, with brick on the second and third floors.

The building title is mounted in the entablature over the colonnade on the front. Originally “United States Post Office” in attached metal letters, the original title has been moved to one side several feet to allow the addition of “Federal Building-.” The building’s cornerstone, laid in a 1931 ceremony, is located in the foundation at the southeast corner and is inscribed:

A. W. Mellon
Secretary of the Treasury
James A. Wetmore
Acting Supervising Architect
1931

An article printed in the Las Vegas Evening Review announcing the November 1932 opening of the Post Office described the original layout of the first floor of the facility:

There are 11 windows in the new postoffice room, but all of them will not be used, (Postmaster) Ryerse explained. There will be two general delivery windows, a stamp window, postal savings and registered mail, and money order windows. The parcel post window, for incoming and outgoing parcel post will have ample space to handle all of the parcel post needs of Las Vegas.

In the rear of the building there is a large loading platform which is separate from the workingroom of the postoffice proper, and in the west wing of the basement a large storeroom has been set aside for the use of the postoffice.

One of the features of the new postoffice is a “swing room” for the mail carriers, a recreation room equipped with comfortable chairs, reading tables, and a shower bath, for the mail carriers while waiting for mail distribution.

The windows discussed in the article were situated around a central U-shaped main public lobby, entered from the front loggia. The lobby and other first floor spaces have undergone some change since the building’s opening, but the public spaces have retained a degree of integrity. The lobby has been divided into two smaller spaces by a contemporary aluminum window wall, and the west two postal windows have been removed to create more room for additional post office boxes (the east three windows remain). East of the lobby are the offices of the Postmaster and Assistant Postmaster, with the attendant hallway, vault and toilet; these remain as original. West of the lobby is the main stair to the second floor, an elevator and money order registry office (the office has been removed also to make room for additional post office boxes). The main workroom and mailing vestibule and platform are situated behind (to the north of) the lobby and remain in original configuration. Although altered somewhat by the addition of a suspended ceiling and some new wall finishes, the main lobby still features many of its original components, including: the terrazzo floor with brass strip inlay and marble borders, travertine walls and pilasters, decorative ironwork for the elevator surround and original iron writing tables. The stair to the second floor features marble treads set in a steel frame, plaster walls, terrazzo landings and decorative iron balustrade. The main workroom has its original plaster walls and ceiling with the inspector’s gallery overhead.

The second and third floors are organized as series of office or court spaces lined along single U-shaped hallways. The heart of the building – and its most impressive space – is the courtroom centered on the north wall of the second floor. After the District Court moved from the building, this room was subdivided
into a smaller court space for the Tax Court and an office space. The cut-down Tax Court still has many of the original courtroom elements, including travetine walls and pilaster shafts, stylized pilaster capitals and crown ornamentation made of terra cotta, coffered ceiling with decoratively cast plaster beams, marble wall base and oak furniture. The axis of the courtroom has been shifted from east-west, with the judge’s bench centered on the east wall, to north-south with the bench on the north wall. The space has been altered in other ways: the addition of suspended ceiling between the plaster beams, carpeting, covering over of the north wall windows (no natural light now enters the room), addition of contemporary light fixtures and registers and – most unfortunate of all – painting of the polychrome terra cotta capitals and frieze ornaments. The upper story halls are in original condition, with terrazzo floors, plaster walls and ceilings with a moulded plaster crown and pilaster caps and dark oak doors and frames. Second and
third story offices have undergone some change, primarily in the form of carpeting and suspended ceilings.

The Federal Building/U.S. Post Office is sited facing south within the six-block Civic Center just north of the central business district of Las Vegas. Set back from the sidewalk within a small grassed lawn, it is massed as a great three-story block – a brick box with terra cotta trim set upon a raised foundation.
The building represents mainline, albeit eclectic, neoclassicism with its large flat-sided Ionic colonnades, formal loggia, classical moulded and dentiled entablature and Georgian balustraded parapet; it also displays the classical vertical hierarchy of base, body and cap, the base formed by the terra cotta sided first floor, the body by the upper story brick walls and great colonnades and the cap by the entablature and expressed parapet. The building has been maintained well, and the exterior appears today in almost original condition. The interior has undergone changes to accommodate the changing needs since its construction, but the changes have been made with some sensitivity, and the original character of
the public spaces is retained. As a regionally important example of neoclassical public architecture, the Federal Building is one of the city’s major historic buildings. It is a prominent landmark – the most refined and best preserved of Las Vegas’ Depression-era architecture.

Hopes for a new building were renewed in December 1923 with the announcement that the city was included in a public buildings appropriation in Washington. Local boosting for the building continued into the next year, and on 28 June 1924 the Las Vegas Age ran a lengthy argument for the proposed structure. Entitled “Public Building is Necessary to Meet Growth of Las Vegas,” the article stated:

The room and equipment provided for the Las Vegas postoffice have long been inadequate. Within the last few months additional room and five hundred additional boxes have been provided for the office, but these are now being used nearly to the limit of capacity. With only a slight increase in the present business the enlarged quarters will be found inadequate and the public again obliged to suffer the inconveniences which were so annoying for several years…

The present city proper was founded in the month of May 1905, by people who moved into it from the Original Townsite of Las Vegas, Nevada, which was generally known as the “construction camp” during the building of the railroad, and by people who came from every State in the Union; pioneers they were, but of a type who came to stay and build a city…

There are no government buildings erected in the southern part of the State; yet the City of Las Vegas and the County of Clark have never failed to meet the call of the United States Government for any requirement demanded… With a population of 4500 people, and with the population steadily increasing, and with no possibility of its growth being stopped or even retarded, we feel that we are entitled to proper postoffice facilities for the handling of United States mail by having an up-to-date Federal postoffice building.

However, Congress had not approved any authorization for new construction since the end of the earlier boom in 1913 and in 1924 was in no mood for new public buildings. The bill was defeated and with it the city’s post office. It would not be until five years later, in 1929, that Las Vegas would receive its first post office building, erected not by the government but by a local businessman/ contractor, P.O. Sullivan. Sullivan completed the building, a single-story brick structure, in June of that year, and it immediately opened as the city’s post office. In a community grateful for any building, Sullivan’s post office was well received. Reported the Age on 4 June:

The new postoffice opened for business yesterday morning at Second and Carson, and Las Vegans are becoming accustomed to the increased convenience made possible by the new structure and new equipment. The building, erected and owned by P.J. Sullivan, serves a long-felt need of the community it is agreed by all, and its opening has long been looked forward to by the community and postoffice workers alike.

The government had signed a five-year lease and had installed some $20,000 of new equipment in the building, but even before the new facility was opened the Treasury Department had already begun the search for a site for its new federal building. District Engineer Arthur Newman was dispatched to Las Vegas in August 1924 to assess several sites which had been offered for the building. Newman told city officials that $20,000 had been appropriated for site acquisition but nothing had yet been set aside for building construction, adding, “Other localities are crying out for federal buildings, and competition for federal building money is keen in Washington. Las Vegas is fortunate in having friends in the U.S. senate and in the house who are close in the confidence of the administration and whose efforts have resulted in placing this city on the building program for this year.” Newman’s visit sparked another round of boosting for a new building. Again, the Age:

The need of Las Vegas for a federal building to house the post office as well as the administration officials of the Boulder Dam work and other governmental departments such as the United States court, U.S. Marshall’s office, Commissioner, etc., all of which will need quarters in Vegas, has been recognized by the departments and Congress…

There are hundreds of cities in the United States with claims for a federal building just as good as ours, in some cases, perhaps, better. Congressmen, senators and business men are every day exerting pressure
in favor of their own projects and any valid excuse for delay in the Las Vegas project would be decidedly to the advantage of some other city.

For several years the work of securing recognition in our needs and desires has been under way. It was not easy to convince the men in power at Washington of the merit of our cause.

Now that our project is approved and on the program for immediate construction, it is to be hoped that no sectional controversies will arise. We each have our individual preferences. It may be that this site or
that site will better serve our own particular interests. And whatever site is selected will not suit all of us.

Newman’s veiled warning that the city could again lose its chance at a federal building if a site could not be secured quickly had its effect on city officials. A parcel of land that Las Vegas had been holding to build a city park was offered to the Treasury official, and it was accepted only after the city gave assurance
that the site and adjacent streets would be improved. With a site secured, the Supervising Architect’s office of the Treasury began to design the building.

The Federal Building planned for Las Vegas was in reality part of an enormous construction program undertaken by Congress and the Hoover administration in the late 1920s and early 1930s. During this period some 1300 new civil federal buildings were erected across the country, nearly doubling the number under the aegis of the Treasury Department. The program was initiated in 1926 – the first such federal initiative for public building construction since 1913 – with a Congressional authorization of $165 million over a period of eleven years. The authorization was increased by $125 million in 1928 and, with the Depression worsening, by $330 million in 1930 and 1931. The total appropriation, including revenues from the sale of so-called obsolete structures which added $69 million, hovered at $700 million. According to Lois Craig in The Federal Presence: “In terms of establishing the image of the United States government, this program was the most important undertaken since the first few decades under the Constitution.”

The massive construction effort was designed to serve three functions. First, it represented fiscal pragmatism and was calculated to reduce the rising rental costs incurred by the growing number of federal agencies in leased space. The program also afforded Congress an opportunity to distribute political presents in the form of post offices and courthouses, a type of logrolling it historically has found hard to resist. Finally, under the deepening shadow of the Depression, the building program was in the later years also a make-work program, intended to provide jobs for the local unemployed. A predecessor to the myriad New Deal programs (Roosevelt took office as the Las Vegas Federal Building was nearing completion), Hoover’s building program was later absorbed within the Public Works Administration.

This renewed activity rekindled long dormant animosities between the Supervising Architect’s (SA) office in the Treasury Department and private architects, represented by the American Institute of Architects. The AIA, protective of a membership beleaguered by the Depression, objected loudly to in-house design of federal buildings by the SA’s office, which had increased its staff from 432 in 1929 to 750 in 1932. A 1931 Resolution of the AIA Board of Directors proclaimed:

We believe that the country is entitled to the services of the best architectural talent available, and that the concentration of so large a volume of work as the present appropriations provide, into the hands
of a single Government bureau, must inevitably tend to produce stereotyped, mediocre and uninspiring results.

Architects railed against the SA repeatedly in the trade periodicals; American Architect was particularly fervent in its criticism, regularly publishing articles like “Government Architects Cannot Create Beauty” and “The Time Has Come for Government to Get Out of the Architecture Business.” A counterattack was
printed in the April 1933 Federal Architect, a magazine sympathetic to the SA:

The ethics of the profession has certainly taken a jolt when the architects of the country on letterheads of their A.I.A. Chapters blacken without investigation the work of other architects’ offices with the naïve and frank admission that it is for the purpose of getting architectural commissions for themselves.

The Federal Architectural offices are weaned and reared on criticism. If they use material A, delegations appear to lambaste them for not using material B. Or vice versa. If they face the building north, a newspaper crusade develops because it was not faced south. The bitter attacks of private architects are, therefore, merely the regular order… But one could have wished that architects would have stood by architects.

Although the Public Buildings Acts of 1926 and 1930 granted the Treasury Department the option to commission private architects for federal projects for the first time since the repeal of the Tarnsey Act in 1911, the Hoover administration used their services sparingly, and the fusillades continued throughout the early 1930s.

There were stylistic differences as well. At one extreme was the SA’s office, which continued to advocate classicism as the appropriate symbolic expression for public buildings. The SA executed hundreds of buildings of varying scales with classical facades and detailing during the twenties and thirties. James A. Wetmore was the Acting Supervising Architect from 1915 to 1933. A graduate of the Georgetown University Law School, Wetmore was not himself an architect, the reason for the “Acting” before his title; stylistic direction for the office was given by the Superintendent of the Architectural Division Louis A. Simon, a stylistic traditionalist who later succeeded Wetmore as Supervising Architect – the Treasury’s last. At the other end of the spectrum were a number of architects in the avant garde of the private sector. Embracing the tenets of the emerging Art Deco and Moderne styles (and a decade later the International style), these architects designed public buildings relatively unembellished by ornamentation and austere when compared with their classical predecessors. Between the two extremes, architects designed with a wide range of stylistic expression, combining new forms with borrowed revivalist or vernacular forms or motifs or somehow compromising between the classical and modern trends to create what is today termed “starved classicism.”

The construction drawings completed by the SA for the Las Vegas Federal Building in early 1931 showed a building that was, typical for that office, mainstream neoclassicism. A rendering of the front elevation appeared in a September 1931 article in Architectural Forum magazine by Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Ferry K. Heath. On 22 July 1931, bids for construction of the building were opened in Washington. It appeared that Murch Brothers of Saint Louis had submitted the lowest proposal with a bid of $247,000. However, the bid of Plains Construction Company from Pampa, Texas arrived several days later, reportedly help up in the mail. Plains’ bid, $10,000 below that of Murch Brothers, was accepted by the Treasury Department. Ever mindful of the cheapest bid, the government awarded the construction contract to an unproved contractor, although Murch Brothers had already built several federal buildings in cities all over the country. The city eagerly awaited construction of its long-awaited building, as the Evening Review-Journal reported on 1 August 1931:

Contract for construction of the new federal building to be erected at Las Vegas, was awarded this morning to the Plains Construction company at Pampas, Texas, on a bid of $237,000, it was announced by officials of the treasury department.

The building as designed, will be a three story structure with full basement of brick and terra cotta construction – one of the finest of the smaller postoffices now being built, treasury department officials
declared.

Construction commenced soon after, but problems began to crop up. In September 1931 it was discovered that the building under construction was 32′ off-center from Third Street. With the excavation completed and foundations begun, Treasury officials decided to accept the building in its existing location, although as site inspector T.J. Williams stated: “If the building was erected according to the first plan, it would certainly make a much better appearance, as it would set nearer to the center!ine of the city park and show up from the present business district as being at the end of North Third Street.” As construction continued through the winter, more problems came up. Finally, on February 1932 Plains’ contract was terminated when it was discovered that the company’s owner, J.O. Pearson, had forged the signatures of the sureties for his bond. The Salt Lake City and Dallas offices of the FBI were called in to
investigate the irregularities, and a Grand Jury was convened in Amarillo on 2 May 1932 to consider criminal charges against Pearson. As the court case continued in Texas and subcontractors for Plains began to file claims against the government (which were rejected), the project was rebid by the Treasury
Department; on 22 July the contract for construction of the remainder of the building was awarded to Rosen and Fischel, Inc. of Chicago. This new company had been the lowest of nineteen bidders with a proposal of $220,553. Construction was begun soon thereafter and continued without further report of incident through the rest of the year and into 1933. In September postal officials began preparing for the move into the new building; it was made two months later as the new Federal Building was opened for business on November 27.

The operational history of the Federal Building has, unsurprisingly, consisted of the daily activities of the occupant agencies. Today it still houses the post office on the main floor, although the facility has been demoted from main office to station status with the construction of the new building in 1967. The second
floor is occupied by the U.S. Tax Court (in the original District courtroom), the U.S. Army Recruiting Center and offices of the Bureau of Land Management; the third floor houses the offices of the Small Business Administration. Although the Federal Building at Las Vegas is not quite fifty years old, its shortfall is so
minor as to be almost moot. The building is an important structure for the city, both architecturally and historically; a pivotal building in the central business district, it is a local landmark for Las Vegas – the first federal building erected in the city and a well-executed and -preserved example of 20th century neoclassical architecture.

Owyhee County Court House

04 Tuesday Oct 2022

Posted by Jacob Barlow in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Courthouses, Idaho, Murphy, Owyhee County

Owyhee County Court House, located at 20381 ID-78 in Murphy, Idaho

Related:

  • The Otter Massacre
← Older posts

Follow Jacob

Follow Jacob

Blog Stats

  • 2,061,189 hits

Social and Other Links

BarlowLinks.com

Recent Posts

  • Navajo Shadehouse Museum
  • Impossible Canyons
  • The Old Hurricane Bell
  • Goulds Shearing Corral
  • Morgan Union Pacific Depot

Archives

Loading Comments...